I’ve received ideas as to how to structure our conversation to get the most from it.
One gentleman has found it helpful to understand the readings in terms of three questions:
- What apologetic vindication or push back does the writing provide?
- What can the writing tell us about the state of our Church today?
- What is this spiritual father saying to me right now?
Nice! Let’s structure our discourse around these questions.
Another has suggested that a willing member give a short report on the reading at the beginning of the meeting (a different member for each meeting (and for each reading where there are more than one)). I think it would be a good idea to create a rotation of the willing.
DSMW
